Belief in aliens isn’t just about flying saucers — it’s often a mirror reflecting our hopes, fears, and desire to understand our place in the cosmos. Whether viewed through science, spirituality, or psychology, it taps into something profoundly human.
Would you say your interest in aliens is more scientific, spiritual, or personal?
Belief in ghosts and the paranormal is widespread, but there is no scientific evidence proving their existence. Whether to believe is a personal choice often shaped by culture, psychology, and personal experiences.
👻 Why People Believe in Ghosts
Schrödinger’s Cat is a thought experiment devised by the Austrian physicist Erwin Schrödinger, which he designed to illustrate a paradox of quantum superposition wherein a hypothetical cat may be considered both alive and dead simultaneously because its fate is linked to a random event that may (or may not) occur.
Schrödinger’s Cat, as a thought experiment, states that if you seal a cat in a box with something that can eventually kill it, you won’t know if the cat is alive or dead until you open the box. So, until you open the box and observe the cat, the cat is simultaneously dead and alive.
We often use Schrödinger’s thought experiment to explain the concept of superposition. The experiment states that a hypothetical cat is locked in a box with some radioactive substance controlling a vial of poison. When the substance decays, it triggers a Geiger counter that causes the poison to be released, thereby killing the cat.
Since the box is locked — and we on the outside don’t know whether or not the radioactive substance has decayed and released the poison — we can’t tell if the cat is dead or alive. So, until we open the box to know for sure, the cat is both dead and alive. Mathematically speaking, there’s a 50 percent chance the cat is dead and a 50 percent chance the cat is alive.
In quantum mechanics terms, the cat’s ability to be in an ambiguous state of both alive and dead until it’s observed (i.e. when someone opens the box) is referred to as quantum indeterminacy or the observer’s paradox. The paradox states that an event or an experiment’s observer affects its outcome. In this case, whoever is performing this hypothetical experiment can affect whether the cat remains in an unknown state or they can open the box and know if the cat is dead or alive with 100 percent certainty.
The experiment also points out when the resolution of possibilities occurs. The experiment is intended to make people ask themselves if it was logical for the observation to trigger the answer. After all, wouldn’t the cat be either dead or alive even if we never open the box?
In quantum mechanics, the observer (the person conducting the experiment) has a role in the results of the experiment. In this case, we are unaware of the cat’s state until the observer opens the box. Until the observer opens the box, the cat exists in a superposition state; that is, the cat is both alive and dead. Only by opening the box and looking at what’s inside (i.e., observing it) is the cat’s state confirmed to be one of the two states. This is called The Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics, which basically explains that a quantum system exists in all of its possible states at the same time. Only when we make an observation can we confirm the true state of the system.
Quantum reality and the Schrödinger’s Cat experiment can be interpreted in various manners. Here’s a few different interpretations for these concepts and how they are measured:
The Copenhagen interpretation proposes that a quantum system exists in a superposition of all possible quantum states simultaneously until it is measured or observed. In the Copenhagen interpretation, the quantum state’s wave function (a mathematical description of the quantum state of a quantum system) collapses into a single, definite state once the state is observed.
Developed in the 1920s, the Copenhagen interpretation is one of the earliest and most widely taught interpretations of quantum mechanics, and is often the interpretation referenced in relation to Schrödinger’s Cat.
The many-worlds interpretation proposes that all possible outcomes of a quantum event actually do occur, but in separate, parallel universes
We often use Schrödinger’s thought experiment to explain the concept of superposition. The experiment states that a hypothetical cat is locked in a box with some radioactive substance controlling a vial of poison. When the substance decays, it triggers a Geiger counter that causes the poison to be released, thereby killing the cat.
We often use Schrödinger’sthought experiment to explain the concept of superposition.
The experiment states that a hypothetical cat is locked in a box with some radioactive substance controlling a vial of poison. When the substance decays, it triggers a Geiger counter that causes the poison to be released, thereby killing the cat. ..
Schrödinger’s Cat is a thought experiment devised by the Austrian physicist Erwin Schrödinger, which he designed to illustrate a paradox of quantum superposition wherein a hypothetical cat may be considered both alive and dead simultaneously because its fate is linked to a random event that may (or may not) occur.
Schrödinger’s Cat, as a thought experiment, states that if you seal a cat in a box with something that can eventually kill it, you won’t know if the cat is alive or dead until you open the box. So, until you open the box and observe the cat, the cat is simultaneously dead and alive.
Are human fantasies just mere ephemera?
Not at all — human fantasies are far more than fleeting whims. They’re often the scaffolding of our deepest desires, fears, and creative impulses. While some fantasies may be short-lived or whimsical, many have enduring psychological, cultural, and even historical significance.
In short, while 'woke' thinking is not a religion in the traditional sense, it often functions like one—complete with moral codes, rituals, and a vision of justice. Whether this is empowering or problematic depends on one's perspective.
Moral Absolutism and Dogma Woke movements often promote strong moral convictions about justice, equality, and identity. Critics argue that these convictions can resemble religious dogmas—unchallenged truths that define right and wrong, with dissent viewed as heresy.
Rituals and Symbolism Public acts like kneeling, chanting slogans, or taking pledges at rallies have been likened to religious rituals. For example, a Black Lives Matter event in Bethesda involved participants kneeling and reciting anti-racism pledges, which some observers interpreted as quasi-religious behavior
I
That’s a fascinating and provocative question — one that touches on ethics, sociology, and even evolutionary psychology. Let’s unpack it.
To say “morality is no more than social hygiene” suggests that:
Moral rules function like public health rules — they exist to prevent social “infection” (conflict, chaos, distrust).
Morality isn’t an objective truth or divine law, but rather a social mechanism that keeps a community functioning smoothly.
So, just as washing hands prevents disease, honesty, fairness, and cooperation prevent social breakdown.
(a) Evolutionary/Sociobiological Perspective
From an evolutionary standpoint, moral behavior evolved because it enhanced group survival.
Cooperation, altruism, and fairness build trust, which helps groups thrive.
Groups that enforced moral norms outcompeted those that didn’t.
Thus, morality could indeed be seen as a form of “social hygiene” — rules that keep the social organism healthy.
(b) Sociological View (Durkheim, Foucault, etc.)
Sociologists like Émile Durkheim argued that moral norms are collective rules that maintain social order.
Foucault might add that morality also functions as a disciplinary system, regulating behavior much like health policies regulate the body.
So morality, in this sense, is a way of maintaining social stability and power structures.
(a) Reductionism
Reducing morality to mere “social hygiene” ignores its inner dimension — the sense of justice, empathy, and duty that goes beyond mere social utility.
People often act morally against social norms or self-interest (think of whistleblowers or reformers like Socrates or Gandhi).
That suggests morality isn’t just a tool for social order.
(b) The Question of Moral Truth
Philosophers like Kant or Plato would insist morality is grounded in reason or objective moral law, not social convenience.
If morality were purely social hygiene, then slavery, caste systems, or oppression — once “socially hygienic” — would have been moral, which feels intuitively wrong.
One might say morality originates as social hygiene (a way to manage coexistence) but develops into something richer — a shared pursuit of justice, empathy, and meaning.
It’s both:
Functional (to sustain community), and
Normative (to express what we ought to be as humans).
Many renowned physicists—like Albert Einstein, Max Planck, and Robert Millikan—expressed belief in a higher order or divine intelligence, though their definitions of “God” varied widely.
Others, like Stephen Hawking, leaned toward naturalistic explanations, suggesting that physics could explain the universe without invoking a deity.
IS PHYSICS A SYNOMYN FOR GOD
No, physics is not a synonym for God—but some thinkers explore deep connections between them.
Physics is the scientific study of the natural laws governing matter, energy, space, and time. God, on the other hand, is a metaphysical concept rooted in theology, spirituality, and philosophy. While they operate in different domains—physics in the empirical and God in the transcendent—many have pondered their relationship:
IN A LITERARY TEXT THERE IS NO BEGINNING, NO END
THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS LITERARY ORIGINALITY JUST A SWARMING
POLYSEMIC PLURALITY
That's a bold and fascinating statement — “Literary texts have no beginning or end.” It echoes post-structuralist ideas, especially those of Roland Barthes and Michel Foucault, who challenged traditional notions of authorship and textual boundaries.
Here’s a deeper look at what that might mean:
Texts are open-ended: Readers bring their own experiences, contexts, and interpretations, which means a text can be endlessly re-read and re-understood.
No fixed meaning: The idea suggests that meaning isn’t locked into a single moment of creation or conclusion — it evolves with time and audience.
ALL LITERARY TEXTS ARE WOVEN OUT OF OTHER LITERARY TEXTS
`THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS LITERARY ORIGINALITY
FOR IT. THE WRITTEN WORK RESIDES IN ITS POLYSEMIC PLULARITY AND DESPITE AUTHORIAL
CLAIMS CANNOT BE RENDERED DETERNMINATE - ALL LITERARY TEXTS
ARE INTER-TEXTUAL- THE CRITIC IS JUST ANOTHER COUP DE GRACE TYPE TEXT LADLING ON
THE STRUCTURAL CEMENT OF MEANING , WHICH SOME, BARTHES, DEEM TO BE INHERENTLY TERRORISTIC, THE TEXT IS THE LAST ENCKAVE IN WHICH
THE SOI DISANT (so called\) intelletctual critic can voice their insights in their
blind narcissism
Deconstuction is ultimately a political practise which endeavours to dismantle and bind the particular system of thought that maintains its power.
As RELIGION this extremely effective enormously powerful
ideological form was evaporating in the late
19th century, under the twin impacts of scientific
discovery and social change, such events were extremely effective in Religious ideology
which is an extremely effective form of ideological
control
r
Belief in aliens isn’t just about flying saucers — it’s often a mirror reflecting our hopes, fears, and desire to understand our place in the cosmos. Whether viewed through science, spirituality, or psychology, it taps into something profoundly human.
Would you say your interest in aliens is more scientific, spiritual, or personal?
You're touching on an important and sometimes controversial topic in addiction recovery.
You're right that group therapy—including peer support, shared experiences, and accountability—is a core element of what helps many alcoholics recover. This is especially evident in programs like Alcoholics Anonymous (AA), therapeutic communities, and other group-based treatment models.
However, it's worth noting a few perspectives:
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) and Group Therapy are backed by clinical evidence as effective treatments for alcohol use disorder (AUD).
Support groups help reduce isolation, increase motivation, and provide role models for recovery.
AA incorporates spiritual elements, such as surrendering to a "higher power."
,,,are we really ready for a one of our character flaws to be described as a ‘wiring problem’. And if you are feeling happy would it make you irritated if someone described your state of happiness as ‘a cascade of reward neurotransmitters’.
Or, your state of depression described as a ‘chemical imbalance’, or of some heroic act you did that imperilled your own safety as, was no more than your ‘special altruism-boosting, mirror neurons,’ impelling you to act.
Or the moral hazards of the criminal pleading innocent on the basis that his brain made him do it, ‘look at my brain scan’. For many this might conjure up Orwellian “thought crime.” a Frankenstein science, leading to a post-human future and are we really ready for a one of our character flaws to be described as a ‘wiring problem’. And if you are feeling happy would it make you irritated if someone described your state of happiness as ‘a cascade of reward neurotransmitters’. Or, your state of depression described as a ‘chemical imbalance’, or of some heroic act you did that imperilled your own safety as, was no more than your ‘special altruism-boosting, mirror neurons,’ impelling you to act. Or the moral hazards of the criminal pleading innocent on the basis that his brain made him do it, ‘look at my brain scan’. For many this might conjure up Orwellian “thought crime.” a Frankenstein science, leading to a post-human futurevvv
a deep question! It ties into ideas about creativity, influence, and even what we mean by "originality." Some people think that nothing can truly be original because everything is built on previous ideas, experiences, or knowledge. In a way, originality is just a new combination of old things. It’s like how every song, painting, or movie feels “new,” but it’s often drawing on influences that came before.
Time itself is not man-made.
Time, as a dimension, exists naturally in the universe. It’s a fundamental part of how the universe operates — things change, decay, move, and evolve. In physics:
Einstein’s theory of relativity shows that time is relative (it can move slower or faster depending on speed and gravity).
Time is interwoven with space as spacetime.
So, from nature’s point of view, time is real, not invented by humans
